Despite the effort to beef it up, Windows Defender came in last in tests performed by German institute AV-TEST Credit: Shutterstock In spite of a recent effort to improve the performance and detection rates in Windows Defender, Microsoft’s anti-malware tool is still not very good at its job. According to the latest tests, it’s downright lousy. The latest round of tests performed by German institute AV-TEST, one of the most respected and regarded malware testing shops, show that Microsoft Security Essentials and Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool fared the poorest in removing an existing infection. AV-TEST conducted a lengthy, comprehensive test over a 12-month period to determine the best malware removal solutions for Windows 10. This involved 897 individual evaluations for each product, evaluating eight security suites. How AV-TEST evaluated the anti-malware tools The study consisted of two parts. First, the tools were installed on a system that was already affected. That’s an interesting test in and of itself because a lot of malware will actually block any attempted installation of an anti-malware product once the system is infected. Second, the suites were installed on a system but temporarily disabled in order to allow the malware infection to occur. Then the security software was reactivated. As AV-TEST noted, Microsoft Security could not deal with four malware samples that prevent cleanup, and it was the only security product that was blocked by malware infections: “Eight times, Microsoft Security Essentials proved either totally or partially ineffective against the malware.” In the test of seven tools to clean up after a malware attack, the Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool failed to detect a total of 26 samples of malware out of 39 total and was not able to detect three active malware components. Of the 39 infections, Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool cleaned only seven of the systems completely. Its repair rate was 25.6 percent. Kaspersky Virus Removal Tool got all 39, and Bitdefender got 35. Among the eight security suites tested, Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool came in last with a 90 percent repair rate, with everyone else scoring 97 percent or higher. AV-TEST concluded that test suites are getting better, but it said nothing about Microsoft’s performance. It noted Avira Antivirus Pro, Kaspersky Internet Security 2016/2017, Malwarebytes Anti-Malware and Avast! Free Antivirus 2016 as the best performers. Related content reviews 8 free Wi-Fi stumbling and surveying tools for Windows and Mac Measuring signal strength, channels, MAC addresses and security status of Wi-Fi networks is essential to monitoring Wi-Fi networks, and here are free tools – some for Windows, some for Macs – that can do just that. By Eric Geier Aug 11, 2020 13 mins Small and Medium Business Mac Wi-Fi analysis Microsoft adds resiliency, redundancy, security to Windows Server 2019 Windows Server 2019 upgrades enable greater scalability and more reliable recovery from outages for Shielded Virtual Machines. By Rand Morimoto Jun 18, 2018 4 mins Small and Medium Business Disaster Recovery Windows Server news analysis Leveraging Windows Server 2016 for hyperconvergence Hyperconverged infrastructure tools in Windows Server 2016 can support storage, SDN and cost savings when building enterprise data centers. By Rand Morimoto Mar 01, 2018 5 mins Small and Medium Business Windows Server SDN how-to Linux command line tools for working with non-Linux users If you work within a Linux terminal, working with non-Linux users can be difficult. These tools help with document compatibility and companywide instant messaging. By Bryan Lunduke Nov 01, 2017 4 mins Small and Medium Business Linux Windows PODCASTS VIDEOS RESOURCES EVENTS NEWSLETTERS Newsletter Promo Module Test Description for newsletter promo module. Please enter a valid email address Subscribe